• Should I Join the Foreign Service?

    November 28, 2011

    Tags: , , ,
    Posted in: Embassy/State, Other Ideas

    Before having my beard shaved off and being shunned, my position was at the State Department’s Board of Examiners, where for over a year since returning from Iraq I administered the Foreign Service Oral Assessment (FSOA) and helped choose the next generation of Foreign Service Officers. I was more or less competent at the task, got a good performance review and, after a year on the job, it was only after my book came out that State decided I could not work there. Something vague about not suddenly having judgement anymore, like losing one’s mojo I guess.

    So, I spent a lot of time around people interested in a Foreign Service career. They did not ask for advice and at the Board we did not offer it. However, since my book came out, ironically more people now approach me with the same question about joining the Foreign Service. Too much irony these days.

    What I tell them is this: think very, very carefully about a Foreign Service career. The State Department is looking for a very specific kind of person and if you are that person, you will enjoy your career and be successful. I have come to understand that the Department wants smart people who will do what they are told, believing that intelligence can be divorced from innovation and creativity. Happy, content compliance is a necessary trait, kind of like being British but without the cool accent. The Department will not give you any real opportunity for input for a very long time, years, if ever. There is no agreed-upon definition of success or even progress at State, no profits, no battles won, no stock prices to measure. Success will be to simply continue to exist, or whatever your boss says it is, or both, or neither. You may never know what the point is other than that a visiting Congressional delegation go away with a “happy ending,” whatever that even is.

    At the same time, State has created a personnel system that will require you to serve in more and more dangerous places, and more and more unaccompanied places, as a routine. That sounds cool and adventurous at age 25, but try and imagine if you’d still be happy with it at age 45 with a spouse and two kids. What are your core obligations with a child who needs some extreme parenting as you leave your wife at home alone with him for a year so you can be a placeholder for State’s commitment to be as macho as the military?

    Understand that promotions and assignments are more and more opaque. Changes in Congress will further limit pay and benefits. Your spouse will be un/under employed most of his/her life. Your kids will change schools for better or worse every one, two or three years. Some schools will be good, some not so good, and you’ll have no choice unless you are willing to subvert your career choices to school choices, as in let’s go to Bogota because the schools are good even if the assignment otherwise stinks. You’ll serve more places where you won’t speak the language and get less training as requirements grow without personnel growth. As you get up there, remember your boss the politically-appointed Ambassador can arbitrarily be a real estate broker who donated big to the President’s campaign. Make sure all these conditions make sense to you now, and, if you can, as you imagine yourself 10, 15 and 20 years into the future.

    It is a very unique person who can say “Yes” truthfully and after real soul-searching. Make sure the juice is worth the squeeze before you accept that assignment.

    In the universe where you’ll work, the US will face a continued stagnation on the world stage. When we, perhaps semi-consciously, made a decision to accept an Empire role after World War II, we never built the tools of Empire. No colonial service, no securing of critical resources, no carrot and sticks. We sort of settled on a military-only model of soft occupation. We made few friends or allies, accepting reluctant partners. As changes take place in the developing world, the most likely American the people there encounter now wears a uniform and carries a weapon.

    America faced a choice and blew it. As an Empire, we either needed to take control of the world’s oil or create a more equitable and less martial global society to ensure our access to it. We did neither. We needed either to create a colonial system for adventures like Iraq or Afghanistan along the Victorian model, or not try to invade and rebuild those places. We did neither.

    Simply pouring more and more lives and money into the military is a one way street going in the wrong direction. We can keep spending, but when millions of dollars spent on weapons can be deflected by terror acts that cost nothing, we will lose. When any hearts and minds efforts are derailed by yet another excused collateral damage episode, we will lose.

    For most of the next century, America still has a big enough military that our “decline” will be slow, bloody and reluctant. But, inevitable none the less. By ideologicizing every challenge from Communism to the entire religion of Islam, we have assured ourselves of never really winning any struggle. You can be a part of that if you’d like to join the Foreign Service.



    Related Articles:




    Copyright © 2014. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity. Follow me on Twitter!

  • Recent Comments

    • George Novinger said...

      1

      Ouch!

      11/28/11 5:41 PM | Comment Link

    • MattieB said...

      2

      LOL, *ouch* but true. The only part I don’t fully agree with is the comparison to “acting British.”

      There’s a big difference between “keep calm and carry on,” versus “keep your mouth shut even if what you’re seeing is just wrong, and always remember to kiss up and kick down.”

      Mattie

      11/28/11 6:18 PM | Comment Link

    • Michael S Goodman said...

      3

      don’t waste your time.

      Even if you pass the much-vaunted Foreign Service exam, your chances of ever jumping sucessfully through all the remaining hoops they set for you, and ultimately being hired are minimal.

      The same is true of applying to the CIA. It involves ceaseless legwork, and the odds of ever getting through all their idiotic hoops are equally remote.

      I speak from experience.

      Your best chances of getting on board at those agencies are if you come from an upper-middle or upper class background, and have never had to work, or otherwise be exposed to people or situations that might provide the basis for negative information about you during the ceaseless and idiotic “background check” that both agencies will have the FBI run on you.
      It isn’t just actual criminal records that they check, either.

      11/30/11 8:35 PM | Comment Link

    • Michael S Goodman said...

      4

      Thanks for speaking the truth about what is a very over-glamorized career.

      Believe me, ab the very odious and competitive application process is just not worth the effort, and, from what you say, even if you get through all the hoops, it doesn’t sound like much fun at then end either!

      The one advantage about the CIA is that there you don’t have to portray that “British” type outlook, that you describe!

      11/30/11 8:40 PM | Comment Link

    • State Dept Wants You to Join the Foreign Service — Start Now So You’re on Board on/about 2015 | Diplopundit said...

      5

      […] Should I Join the Foreign Service? […]

      01/14/13 7:50 AM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)