• Budget Update: State Sez Please Sirs, May I Have More?

    February 14, 2012

    Tags: , ,
    Posted in: Embassy/State

    Let’s see, pretty much everyone running for election in 2012 is barking about cutting spending, saving money, that sort of thing. It seems a popular tune these days. So course it is little surprise that after taking serious cuts last year, the State Department is actually asking for MORE money this year, ‘natch.

    The fiscal 2013 budget request asks Congress for $51.6 billion for the State Department and USAID, which the administration describes as a 1.6 percent increase over fiscal 2012 levels in the latest appropriations bill.

    Important to note for anyone who thinks our relations with China, India, Brazil or anywhere else we’re not at war with might matter, that $51.6 billion total includes $8.2 billion in the Overseas Contingency Operations account, which is meant to pay for State’s 5,500 mercenaries, chicken wings and Splenda in Iraq, plus expenses in Afghanistan (which we are still reconstructing just like we did in Iraq) and Pakistan. The State Department budget request is also kind enough to include about $5.5 billion in foreign military financing, I guess because weapons are about America’s only viable export product left. You can go nuts and read the entire budget request here.

    “We know that this is a time of fiscal constraint and economic hardship for the American people,” said Hillary Clinton, “So we are seeking out every opportunity to work smarter and more efficiently.”

    That efficiency no doubts include the indoor swimming pool, driving range, tennis court and bar inside the Embassy in Baghdad, plus the staff in Public Affairs in Washington whose job it is to compile weekly lists of my blog posts (State has a new lawyer assigned to my prosecution, everybody say hi! to Anne). Oh yes, another efficiency are the Hall Walkers at State, foreign service officers State wants to dump but won’t or can’t and who draw full salaries to do little or no work. The electronic controls on State’s computers that block Wikileaks sites are another efficiency, no doubt. A bunch of money is headed toward “social media” (Guys, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter accounts are free to sign up) and important diplomatic breakthroughs like “The 2012 Tag Challenge,” which “calls on technology enthusiasts from several nations to set their sleuthing skills loose on a mock gang of jewel thieves in an international search contest.” There’s a $5000 prize for that one, whatever the hell the point of it is. And hey, the State Department is now getting ready to offer Chrome as an in-house browser, and that’s free too, right? As a true friend of democracy, State also wants $1.3 billion in direct aid to the Egyptian military, plus more than $2 billion in aid to Pakistan.

    But those are petty things, really, and limited to things I know of. Yet they illustrate an organization that, despite its request for more money and a place at the big peoples’ table, seems to also have plenty of time and money for petty things.

    I’m sure Congress will approve State’s request for a budget increase. And the Beach Boys weren’t sad and old on the Grammy Awards.



    Related Articles:




    Copyright © 2014. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity. Follow me on Twitter!

  • Recent Comments

    • Mary said...

      1

      Hello Anne,

      Great to have you here.

      I am wondering if you can look into a case of gross injustice that was committed by a U.S. contractor who was employed by L-3 in Iraq. He sexually harassed Iraqi interpreters and falsified their security records if they rejected his advances. This has caused male and female local staff to be rejected for resettlement in the U.S.

      One interpreter told the Washington Post that the contractor “had relationships with many girls, brought many girls to his room” and “propositioned another girl for a job,” and that “If he didn’t like a girl he fired them without reason.”

      In fact, the US contractor told Kathy (alias) that if she had sex with him, her problems regarding the intelligence report would “go away.”

      I’m sure you are as horrified as me that our country employed such an individual? He committed sex crimes against local staff and was removed from Iraq by a U.S. Army General, yet Kathy has still never received her SIV. She remains in hiding in Iraq with a bounty on her head.

      I would be most grateful if you would contact me and I’d be more than happy to come to DC to resolve this tragedy.

      Her supporters have spent the last three years trying to bring this case to light, and have contacted DOD, State, Consular Affairs, and DHS, but no one has contacted us.

      Here is the WASHINGTON POST article:

      “Iraqi interpreters seek punishment of contractor they say sexually harassed them”

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/iraqi-interpreters-seek-punishment-of-contractor-they-say-sexually-harassed-them/2011/03/24/AFQOfSPE_story.html

      02/15/12 4:02 AM | Comment Link

    • Mary said...

      2

      I’m curious about the charges against you. What have you done that is illegal?

      02/16/12 3:31 AM | Comment Link

    • Administrator said...

      3

      The State Dept believes it has the right to control what I say, and require their approval of each statement I make. I disagree.

      02/16/12 1:19 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)