• ACLU: State Department Violates Van Buren’s Constitutional Rights

    May 16, 2012

    Tags: , , , ,
    Posted in: Democracy, Other Ideas



    (This article also appeared on the Huffington Post, May 17, 2012)

    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), in a letter to the Department of State, said today that the Department’s actions against my book and this blog are unconstitutional, that State’s actions “constitute a violation of Van Buren’s constitutional rights.”

    Straight up, no qualifiers.

    The ACLU reminds the State Department that the Courts have said that “Speech concerning public affairs is more than self-expression, it is the essence of self-government” and citing the numerous legal challenges the State Department has willfully ignored that grant government employees the same First Amendment rights all Americans enjoy.

    Which is what we’ve been saying all along, here, in the New York Times, on NPR, CNN and elsewhere.

    After reviewing the State Department’s policies and regulations, the ACLU states that “The State Department’s pre-publication review process, as it applies to blogs and articles raises serious Constitutional questions,” then goes on to detail those questions. The ACLU notes that State’s actions toward me are but one example of its unconstitutional actions and apply to other employees as well. They conclude that “it is highly unlikely that the State Department could sustain its burden of demonstrating that its policy is constitutional… There is no justification for such expansive prior restraint on State Department employees’ speech.”

    Now them’s fightin’ words, folks.

    Read the entire letter on the ACLU’s website. It is powerful stuff.

    What It Means

    The ACLU’s announcement that the Department of State has violated the Constitutional rights, the First Amendment rights, of one of its own employees comes to the day, 225 years later, that the Constitutional Convention opened in Philadelphia and the founders began writing an extraordinary document. The First Amendment was added later, but the spirit of free speech underlies every clause and sentence of the original document. It is embedded in the very parchment.

    The Founders would retch to see what has become of the spirit of the Enlightment that drove them, simply because America got frightened after 9/11. Those beautiful words of the First Amendment, almost haiku-like, are the sparse poetry of the American democratic experiment. The Founders purposely wrote the First Amendment to read broadly, and not like a snippet of tax code, in order to emphasize that it should encompass everything from shouted religious rantings to eloquent political criticism. Madison and Jefferson were strong enough to give away the power of a government they would run, and place it in the hands of the people that government would serve. There’s courage most of us can never fully understand.

    Now, very sadly, our first Cabinet agency, the Department of State, the part of the US government that speaks most directly to people abroad about freedom and democracy, is run by much smaller men and women. They are afraid of their own employees and afraid of what you– The People– will know the way they go about their wretched business. Hillary Clinton, herself a candidate to take over the seat once held by giants like Jefferson, Adams and Madison, has turned her internal security against a blog, and ordered her frightened followers to get rid of one employee because of a book. Her acts now have a label that will follow her and her Department long past my departure: Unconstitutional.

    Every fluffy speech she makes to Syrian bloggers, or Chinese dissenters, will carry an asterisk– but Madame Secretary, as you criticize oppressive regimes for shutting down free speech, didn’t you order your own followers to silence a critic? Didn’t your Department act unconstitutionally? Are your actions somehow different than Bejing’s?

    Did not you violate, willfully, clearly and repeatedly Madame Secretary the First Amendment rights of an American Citizen? How will you answer them Madame Secretary? Will you lie? Will you defame the ACLU? Will you apply your own legal skills to the analysis of your wrongs? Mumble about a disgruntled employee? Or will you remain silent?

    Of course the State Department has not responded to all this. They have not answered me, they have not answered your letters and emails, they have not answered Members of Congress and they have not answered the ACLU. Why not? There is the ACLU letter, five dense pages of legal justification that leads to the core statement:

    State’s actions constitute a violation of Van Buren’s constitutional rights.. That is the issue. Now, finally, Madame Secretary, how will you answer?



    Related Articles:




    Copyright © 2014. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity. Follow me on Twitter!

  • Recent Comments

    • Mary said...

      1

      Wonderful news.

      What does this mean is State does terminate you? Do you then sue?

      05/16/12 12:45 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...

      2

      The State Department has classified the ACLU letter and issued a warning to its busy workers in the hive not to read the letter: “federal employees and contractors who believe they may have inadvertently accessed or downloaded this letter without prior authorization, should contact their information security offices for assistance.”

      05/16/12 1:18 PM | Comment Link

    • Mark said...

      3

      @ Rich: I laughed when I read your post but I have the feeling it’s not a joke.

      What’s sad is that most Americans can’t even name all five freedoms granted under the First Amendment. What’s both sad and funny is that a survey a while back revealed that about 22% percent of Americans could name all five of the “Simpsons” family members – you know who they are – but just one in 1,000 people could name all five freedoms granted under the First Amendment. That of course is part of the problem.

      At any rate, I’m happy to see all of the support you’re getting, Peter. The planets appear to be aligning.

      Score one for Truth, Justice and the American Way, not a la State but as it was envisioned by the founders. Shame on Hillary Clinton, the State Department and the U.S. government.

      05/16/12 2:05 PM | Comment Link

    • State Department Does Not Care for Breast Cancer Talk | We Meant … | The Cancer Site Online Blog said...

      4

      [...] sure by now you’ve seen the ACLU statement, which basically says the State Department rules on blogs and free speech would not withstand a [...]

      05/16/12 10:52 PM | Comment Link

    • Krauthammer On Drones Flying In US: “Stop It Here, Stop It Now” « News Worldwide « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL said...

      5

      [...] ACLU: State Department Violates Van Buren’s Constitutional Rights (wemeantwell.com) [...]

      05/17/12 4:12 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)