• Billions Wasted, Again: State Likely to Give Up on Costly Efforts to Train Iraqi Police

    May 26, 2012

    Tags: , , , , ,
    Posted in: Democracy, Embassy/State, Iraq

    (This article appeared originally on the Huffington Post on May 14, 2012)

    Well, that did not take long.

    The New York Times reports that the State Department, in the face of massive costs and Iraqi officials who say they never wanted it in the first place, slashed and may soon dump entirely a multibillion-dollar police training program in Iraq that was to have been the centerpiece of post-occupation US presence in Iraq. After all of five months.

    In October I reported on my blog wemeantwell.com that the State Department was on Capitol Hill in front of the Subcommittee on National Security, Homeland Defense and Foreign Operations, begging a skeptical Congress for more money for police training in Iraq. “Training” was again being cited as the cure-all for America’s apparently insatiable desire to throw money away in Mesopotamia. That latest tranche of taxpayer cash sought by State was one billion dollars a year, every year for five years, to pay police instructors and cop salaries in Iraq. The US has been training Iraqi cops for years. In fact, the US government has spent $7.3 billion for Iraqi police training since 2003. Ka-ching! Anybody’s hometown in need of $7.3 billion in Federal funds? Hah, you can’t have it if you’re American, it is only for Iraq!

    Ever-reliable State Department tool Pat Kennedy led the pack of fibbers in asking Congress for the cash: “After a long and difficult conflict, we now have the opportunity to see Iraq emerge as a strategic ally in a tumultuous region.” He went on (…and on) promising “robust this” and “robust that.” Best of all, Pat Kennedy also said that providing assistance to the Iraqi police and security forces “will eventually reduce the cost of our presence as security in the country improves and we can rely on Iraqi security for our own protection.” The Department spends several billion a year on private security contractors to protect the fortress-like Embassy in Baghdad (which itself carries almost a billion dollar price tag, including the indoor pool and Embassy-only bar).

    Don’t Judge Us

    Of course despite the hoary promises by Kennedy of robust oversight and management of the police training program, State blocked inspectors from the US government’s independent auditor for Iraqi reconstruction, SIGIR, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, from conducting an assessment of the Department’s multibillion-dollar effort. Kennedy said: We’re from the government, trust us.

    The inspectors had good reason not to trust Kennedy and State. Specifically, the State Department’s International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) bureau had come under fire from SIGIR for its management of the contract with DynCorp to train police in Iraq, Afghanistan and Jordan. The last SIGIR audit of the State Department’s oversight of the contract concluded that “INL lacks sufficient resources and controls to adequately manage the task orders with DynCorp. As a result, over $2.5 billion in U.S. funds are vulnerable to waste and fraud.”

    State’s track record otherwise with police training also fails severely. The State Department in 2003 was given initial responsibility for training Iraqi police. By 2004, however, State’s efforts were seen as so ineffective, even on an Iraq War scale, that police training was taken away from the suits and folded into the US military mission.

    Water Under the Bridge

    But hey, those previously wasted billions and slapdash attempts to avoid scrutiny by an outside inspector are now like water under the bridge for the State Department, as the entire program is just about ready to collapse anyway.

    The Times reports that the training cadre of about 350 American law enforcement officers was quickly scaled back to 190 and then to 100 as costs rose and Iraqi interest fell. State’s latest restructuring calls for 50 advisers, but State Department officials say even they may be withdrawn by the end of this year. Several colleagues of mine associated with the program report that they are not being asked to stay on, and in fact now rarely even leave their fortified compounds.

    It seems the Iraqis simply do not care for the training State insists they should want. Last month many of the Iraqi police officials who had been participating in the training refused to attend the presentations given by the Americans, saying they saw little benefit. The Iraqis have also insisted that the training sessions be held at their own facilities, rather than American ones (the State Department spent $343 million building the facilities the Iraqis do not want to use, apparently without asking the Iraqis. The largest of the construction projects, at Baghdad Police College, was recently abandoned unfinished after an expenditure of more than $100 million of your tax dollars). The State Department will not allow the trainers to meet regularly at Iraqi facilities out of fear of terrorist ambush and the insane costs of moving people around Iraq safely. Private security contractors have to be hired by State to escort the private police contractors hired by State.

    Failure to Ask = Failure

    That part about asking the Iraqis what they want might have been key to the State Department’s failure in Iraq police training.

    Stalwart American Ambassador to Iraq Jeffrey, who is desperately seeking to curtail his assignment if State can find a successor whom Congress will endorse, mumbled “I think that with the departure of the military, the Iraqis decided to say, ‘O.K., how large is the American presence here?’ How large should it be? How does this equate with our sovereignty? In various areas they obviously expressed some concerns.” “Some concerns” said Ambassador Jeffrey. Actually, the acting head of Iraq’s Interior Ministry questioned the wisdom entirely of spending so much on a program the Iraqis never sought, the equivalent of shouting “Don’t tase me bro!”

    It’s Always Sunny at Foggy Bottom

    The US Embassy in Baghdad released a hard-hitting reply to all of these developments, saying ““The Iraqi Government and the State Department regularly review the size and scope of our law enforcement assistance efforts to ensure that these programs best meet the needs of Iraq’s security forces… The Police Development Program is a vital part of the U.S.-Iraqi relationship.” So that’s settled.

    Thomas Nides, deputy secretary of state for management and resources told the New York Times, “I don’t think anything went wrong. The Iraqis just don’t believe they need a program of that scale and scope.” Apparently Nides, Kennedy and no one at the State Department, none of the thousands of Americans State has in the World’s Largest Embassy in Baghdad, thought to get the Iraqi opinion of the training program before committing billions of dollars. Next time I suggest think first, spend second, ‘kay?

    Note to Hillary Clinton: Before sending your drones to fib to Congress asking for money that should be spent here at home, and then wasting several billion dollars on a project in some foreign country, ask the foreigners if they actually want it first. If they do not want our help, how about returning the billions to the United States where we can sure put it to good use?

    Note to Congress: The next time State comes asking for money, check if their lips are moving. That means they are lying to you. Please cut them off; they’re like drunks loose in Vegas and can no longer help themselves. It’ll be a mercy killing at this point.

    Related Articles:

    Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity.

  • Recent Comments

    • MattieB said...


      The police training is always the same, whether in Latin America, Iraq, or anywhere else.

      The contract is tendered out by INL to Dyncorp, IMO, one of the usual suspects. The instructors are current or retired cops who speak only English, the courses involve many powerpoint slides, also in English, using U.S. examples and anecdotes that often have no relevance whatsoever to local law enforcement conditions and local culture. This is translated onsite by interpreters who struggle to convey the powerpoint slides and irrelevant explanations and analogies to the local police personnel obliged to attend.

      It’s not country-specific, focused training. If it were, the Iraqi cops would probably want to attend and graduate. It’s an exercise to keep bureaucrats, contractors, and the Congress happy, and a robust waste of money.

      05/26/12 3:27 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      Haven’t we seen this movie before?

      You want…some more?


      05/26/12 3:57 PM | Comment Link

    • jo6pac said...


      Please cut them off.

      NO not yet I know I could do any one of these project for half the price. I just want to steal a billion or 2 what can be so bad about that. Those stupid Amerikan cites would spend it on schools, roads, and other worthless projects like hiring people and then giving them good pay and health care. What kind of concept is that.

      Sad but we all know congresscritter will never cut off the death vendors.


      05/26/12 9:15 PM | Comment Link

    • joe carson said...


      any current or former State Dept employee can file whistleblower disclosures with Office of Special Counsel about any “gross waste” they witnessed in State, going back to 1978, if not 1789 (is that when State was created?)

      But only current or former State Dept. employeers can, given the (yes, I think unlawful) way the Office of Special Counsel has interpreted its whistleblower disclosure mandate.

      Have fun, Peter!

      05/26/12 11:27 PM | Comment Link

    • jhoover said...


      Let see how those Billions Wasted

      05/27/12 7:13 AM | Comment Link

    • jhoover said...


      By Joseph R. Biden Jr.
      Sunday, February 6, 2005; Page B07
      At home, we need the administration to level with us about the challenges in Iraq, including the time it will take to develop security forces that can operate independently. Overselling the size or capability of those forces — and leaving a false impression with the American people — is guaranteed to produce a failed policy.

      The writer is a senator from Delaware and the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

      05/27/12 7:22 AM | Comment Link

    • jhoover said...


      Down and out with Iraqi forces

      Equipment for Iraqi security forces is in short supply. Deputy police chief Josef Hussein, working out of a compound in Qayyarah that is within blocks of several police stations destroyed in attacks, complains that his troops lack transport, radios and machine guns. American officers in Qayyarah have promised Hussein that they will do all they can to meet Iraqi forces’ needs. But privately, the same officers admit to me that funds are short.

      Equipment shortages have plagued Iraqi forces since the first new army units were stood up in the fall of 2003, according to Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. In stark contrast to American soldiers, almost all of whom have their own body armor (even if they have had to pay for it themselves), many Iraqi soldiers share a limited number of armor vests and often go without. And while U.S. forces travel in up-armored Humvees, Strykers and other armored vehicles (in some cases also of their own furnishing) that protect them from snipers and roadside bombs, Iraqi forces rely on trucks — or simply walk.

      O’Hanlon questions why outfitting the Iraqi forces hasn’t been a greater priority. “There’s no good reason why Iraqis can’t be equipped,” he says. More than two years into the reconstruction, the Bush administration seems to agree; the president will soon sign an $81.3 billion “emergency” war spending appropriation approved by Congress last week, which includes $5.7 billion for training and outfitting Iraqi troops.

      05/27/12 8:16 AM | Comment Link

    • Meloveconsullongtime said...


      Speaking of human waste, I wonder how many of the State Department and CIA are aware that presently China’s kleptocrats are quickly removing as much money out of the country as possible because they’re in the process of deliberately collapsing the Communist Party regime and they’re in a rush to cover their own asses?

      CIA: Dumbest fucking people on planet Earth.

      05/28/12 2:06 AM | Comment Link

    • Mary said...


      I’d like clarification as to why the Iraq police training need from the U.S.?

      They appear to be very competent and should be able to design a proper police course for their own people.

      Is that true?

      05/29/12 12:19 AM | Comment Link

    • jhoover said...


      I’d like clarification as to why the Iraq police training need from the U.S.?
      Can I pose these questions?
      Early days invasion were US force trying to remove a monstrous regime looking for tope personal, US forces recovered of trillion dollars, did anyone know were those billions went?
      Iraq had billions of dollars as frozen assets in may western world, we know one of US judges agree to pay 40 million from frozen Iraqi money in US as the victims claimed that a monstrous regime have link with Al-Qaeda and 9/11 attack.

      The Iraqi ministry of oil and most Iraqi Oil fields was secured from early days of the war in 2003, Paul Bremer refusal for paying any money to restore/install Meters for the oil production, with that in Mind any one any idea were all that oil production gone? Where is the money from the oil?

      Finally 9.2 billion vanished from Paul Bremer were all those vanished billions?

      Sadly Iraq ended in the hand of an openly pro-Iranian factions and thugs gangs now.

      05/29/12 7:35 AM | Comment Link

    • US Mission Iraq/INL: Sexing-up Them “Engagement” Numbers in Iraq? | Diplopundit said...


      […] Billions Wasted, Again: State Likely to Give Up on Costly Efforts to Train Iraqi Police (wemeantwell.com) […]

      07/30/12 7:21 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)