• State Department ‘Anti-ISIS Recruitment’ Twitter Endorses Islamophobe Nutter

    December 16, 2015

    Tags: , ,
    Posted in: Embassy/State


    So, at the cost of who-knows-how-many of your tax dollars, the State Department, in between deep-sixing Hillary’s old emails, has been fighting ISIS, with The Twitter thingie.

    See, someone determined that if ISIS could use social media to radicalize young people, with a powerful and persuasive message, well, the old, sad white people at the State Department could convince them that ISIS was bad. Plus, it’s social media, which is some sort of newfangled thing all the kids like! After no doubt many late nights, State came up with the clever name of “Think Again, Turn Away,” for its anti-ISIS social media campaign.

    The slogan itself sounds far too much like the 1980s’ hilariously failed anti-drug campaign, “Just Say No.” But this is even funnier.

    See, the social media war for hearts and minds over at State just took another body blow by promoting an anti-Islam advocate as a “human rights hero.” In fact, in honor of #HumanRightsDay, “Think Again Turn Away” Twittered and Facebooked out the message of Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

    The Problem

    The problem?

    Ayaan Hirsi Ali (pictured) speaks loudly, publicly and often about her belief that Islam is an inherently violent “cult of death.” She supports the proposed ban of face veils in France, and of mosques’ minarets in Switzerland. In 2007, she called for the west to destroy Islam using military force.

    This is kinda the wrong signal to send to young people already tuned in to ISIS’ message that the west is indeed at war with Islam itself, and seeks to kill Muslims and occupy their lands. Ali’s message, and the State Department’s endorsement and amplification of it, does little more than confirm many young Muslims’ fears. It does not support the better narrative that the problem is not Islam, and that it is OK to be a Muslim, as long as you are a nice Muslim to the rest of us.

    It is, in social media terms, a massive “boner” of a gaffe.

    How Could They Have Known?

    Now, how could the State Department have known about Ali’s views? All those Muslim names sound alike, right?

    Maybe by checking Wikipedia, which says:

    Ayaan has been a vocal critic of Islam. In 2004, she collaborated on a short movie with Theo van Gogh, entitled Submission, the English rendering of the word “Islam”, a film about the oppression of women under Islam. The documentary sparked controversy, which resulted in death threats against the two and the eventual assassination of Van Gogh later that year by a Dutch Muslim. In a 2007 interview, she described Islam as an “enemy” that needs to be defeated before peace can be achieved.

    Or maybe State could have “Googled” Ali, where they would have found articles with headlines like “Ayaan Hirsi Ali is dangerous: Why we must reject her hateful worldview.”

    Or maybe by watching Fox; Ali is a darling of the right wing haters.

    It’s Not About Her

    Look, I know Ali has a tragic life story, and that she was tortured by radical Islamists. The people State’s anti-ISIS messages are aimed at are already predisposed to accepting radical Islam’s violence. Many seek it out, and to them it forms a part of ISIS’ appeal.

    In the end of the day, this is not about Ali, it is about the pointlessness of the State Department social media campaign. A known Islamophobe won’t convince angry Muslims of anything.

    Related Articles:

    Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity.

  • Recent Comments

    • Kyzl Orda said...


      Yes, another preventable gaffe if only someone either did their homework (could start an ironic campaign and claim she is a whistle blower, then State will suddenly go mum and stop using Ms. Ali), or they are still hiring Fox admirers for these info-anemic PR jobs

      12/16/15 1:06 PM | Comment Link

    • chuck said...


      Feel the Bern?

      12/16/15 2:35 PM | Comment Link

    • teri said...


      “Anti-Isis Recruitment”? Which is hoping to change hearts and minds by “tweeting” on “twitter”? Gosh, we are twits, aren’t we?

      Sounds like “Abstinence-Only Sex Ed”. (Or as we refer to it in this household, “The No-Child-Has-a-Behind” program.)

      C’mon, America. Get your shit together.

      12/16/15 4:34 PM | Comment Link

    • StarkNakedTruth said...


      “A known Islamophobe won’t convince angry Muslims of anything.”

      But it’s important that the American State Department keep spending money on marketing campaigns in order to justify the whole changing ‘hearts and minds’ thingy.

      Remind me again how well that’s working out?

      12/16/15 4:40 PM | Comment Link

    • teri said...


      Meant to mention this in a comment to your last article (or maybe the one before), PVB. Don’t know if you saw it. It’s an example of how our cities are falling apart. In this case, people are dying:

      State of emergency declared in Flint, Michigan over poisoned water supply.


      12/16/15 5:50 PM | Comment Link

    • Helen Marshall said...


      some more detail from Greenwald today. I’m running out of words for the insanity in Washington.


      12/16/15 7:03 PM | Comment Link

    • Bruce said...


      The SD twits sound vaguely Brit : TATA to ISIS! That would be truly a BBC “BONER” !! Particularly when, as the world’s current “Redcoats”; We KNOW the answer is to GTFO of the revolutionaries’ countries!!! Why wait for our “Yorktown”?

      12/16/15 8:39 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)