• Fearing Fear Itself, Now That’s Something to Be Afraid Of

    March 14, 2020

    Tags: , , , , , , , ,
    Posted in: 2020, Trump



     

    This is not about downplaying something serious. It is about preventing mistakes that will make things worse.

    Nothing is more viral than fear. Fear  — fight or flight — is a terrible way to make decisions that call for time, science, and rational thinking. Want to screw up a public health crisis? Let fear drive.
     

    Democrats, conditioned by years of faux-narratives to believe everything Trump does is “an existential threat to America,” are about twice as likely as Republicans to say the coronavirus poses an imminent danger. Our political party should not affect how we respond to an epidemic, but it does.

    “Our hyper-polarization is so strong that we don’t even assess a potential health crisis in the same way. And so it impedes our ability to address it,” said Jennifer McCoy, a Georgia State political science professor. “I am not scared of Covid-19,” a Canadian infectious disease expert wrote, “I am scared about the loss of reason and wave of fear that has induced the masses of society into a spellbinding spiral of panic.” “COVID-19 is infecting our minds, not our lungs,” says Psychology Today. Trump Derangement Syndrome, and whatever its opposite is, might actually help kill us this time.
     

    Fear makes for poor public health decisions. Remember the 1980’s?

    In 1981 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported five cases of a strange pneumonia. The disease didn’t even have a name until the next year, and wasn’t isolated in the lab until 1984. By the end of the decade 27,408 people died from AIDS. It would go on to kill over 500,000 Americans. Yet while a horrible disease and a miserable way to die, in retrospect “the problem with AIDS was really two epidemics — the real health epidemic and the epidemic of the mind.” The New York Times concluded “in the 1980’s, fear spread faster than AIDS.” America paid a price in lives.

    The fear was countable. In the mid-80’s 60 percent of Americans wanted HIV+ people to carry a card noting their status; one in three said employers should fire employees who had AIDS. Some 21 percent of Americans said people with AIDS should be isolated from the rest of society in leper colonies. Even a professional medical journal wrote dramatically “A specter is haunting our streets — the specter of AIDS, a remorseless and incurable disease whose nature, transmission and effects still contain elements of mystery.”
     

    Those mysteries are always the most dangerous elements in shaping public health policy via fear, and with AIDS, centered on exaggerating the problem.

    Given that most early cases surfaced inside communities already viewed as modern day Sodoms, many sought to exaggerate the crisis from a quasi-religious point of view; God was smiting the gays. And some of those homosexuals were coming for your kids! Tragically, too many felt the more who died of AIDS the better, and played up the deaths as “Judgement.” The rest of us, God-fearing, were safe. Homophobia manifested as fear crushed human compassion. It’s almost like hoping the current economy goes into a deep recession, destroying the savings of millions of Americans, so Trump’s chances of reelection fall. Or one politician hoping the virus infects those at MAGA rallies.

    The Reagan administration, with its political debt to newly-empowered evangelical voters, was indifferent at best toward using Federal funds to study or prevent AIDS. Congress agreed; in 1987 it banned the use of federal funds for AIDS prevention and education campaigns that “promoted or encouraged, directly or indirectly, homosexual activities.” Years were lost as the virus spread, and who knows how many died because of the delay in funding.

    The rest of us were not innocent. In the mid-to-late 1980s “AIDS hysteria” was a familiar term in the media and public life, and popular comedians made crude jokes that today would never be sanctioned. A study found “health care trainees and professionals have demonstrated that their level of empathy and caring for HIV/AIDS is negatively affected by the knowledge that the person being treated is homosexual.” A 1985 Time magazine story, “The New Untouchables,” focused on an incident in New York where parents refused to send their children to a school after one student was identified as HIV+. “What about somebody sneezing in the classroom? What about the water fountain? What about kids who get in a fight with a bloody nose? They don’t know!” said one frightened parent.

    Gay activists also sought to drive public opinion through fear. You Mr. Whitebread can catch it too! The fear of a “heterosexual breakout” was employed to coax a Middle American audience toward political awareness. The gay community also sought to exaggerate the extent of the crisis as spur to action, primarily more government funding. In 1988, after New York revised its estimates of HIV+ citizens significantly downward, members of AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (Act Up) were arrested at a sit-in at the Health Department. Hecklers trailed the Health Commissioner demanding he resign. His home was picketed and spray-painted. There were death threats against him. Yet statistical studies some 30 years later showed even his lower numbers from the 1980s overestimated the extent of the epidemic by some 50 percent. The Commissioner had been right to tamp down the threat.

    More radical methods also sought to fight the religious narrative. Act Up disrupted Sunday Mass at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York, where demonstrators desecrated the communion wafers and chained themselves to pews while 4,500 protested outside. A demonstration outside Boston’s Holy Cross Cathedral during an ordination ceremony had Act Up members, some in drag, tossing condoms at newly ordained priests.

    Activists justify their use of fear as the only way to have focused attention on the disease. But that ignores the tragic results of their actions. While funding did increase, much of the government’s early AIDS-prevention budget was used to raise awareness among hetero college students, women, and others who faced relatively low risk. Money was diverted away from the gay communities that needed it the most.

    Even today, AIDS and other fear-mongered diseases soak up a disproportionate share of research funds. Diseases that account for 84 percent of deaths in the U.S. receive less than half of NIH funding. Cancer and HIV/AIDS in particular receive a disproportionately large amount, while chronic diseases like diabetes and obesity receive less funding relative to the costs they impose on society. The squeaky wheel gets the grease irrespective of good public health policy, and the language of those squeaks is fear.
     

    The worry is always the unknown, and on Day One of any epidemic involving a new virus nearly everything is unknown, and near nothing known. Mistakes get made as protocols and procedures are created (in reality, field tested) on the fly. Japan, with an excellent universal health care system and a non-partisan public health bureaucracy, miserably mishandled a cruise ship quarantine, turning the boat into a virus incubator. But while mistakes will be made, protocols will improve. People once believed they should not shake hands with a gay person, or share a public toilet, for fear of catching the disease. As fear forms around the unknown, people, both well-meaning and not, fill the space as science races to catch up. Charlatans promote fake cures. Black marketers run up prices. There will be political hay to be made whether you are driving a pro- or anti- agenda. Things will be unknown until they are known, and no one knows when that is — another unknown.

    “AIDS is grim enough without exaggeration,” cited one prescient editorial of the day. “Why has the truth disappeared so far from view? Perhaps because the chief interpreters of the data want to reflect their own messages. Public health experts see a unique chance to reduce all sexually transmitted diseases. Medical researchers demand $1 billion in new Federal spending against AIDS, hoping to refurbish their laboratories. Government epidemiologists, seeking to protect homosexuals and drug addicts, fear the Reagan Administration may acquire the notion that these are the only people at risk. Moralists see a heaven-sent chance to preach fire, brimstone and restricted sex. Homosexuals have no desire to carry the stigma of AIDS alone.”

    While fear as a manipulative tool, especially as a political manipulative tool, is nothing new, the coronavirus panic appears at a new place in America. Social media lets too many people Joker-like pour fuel on fires, with no interest in putting them out. MSM, which once at least spoke of their job as information gathering, now pursues an unambiguous political agenda when it is not just peddling raw anxiety as a profit center. We are ever more diverse and ever more separated, life divided into subreddits. We live exhausted, on knife’s edge, lip deep in cynicism, decline, illegitimacy, and distrust. We never find time to exhale. It isn’t safe anymore for us to have common fears.

    The bottom line? Fear is a powerful motivator. But fear is a miserable alternative to science and rational thinking, and a terrible tool to employ when fighting an epidemic. Only when science replaced fear did AIDS subside to where today the disease is a manageable element of public health.
     

    So wash your hands. Use sanitizer. Ask questions. The virus is dangerous. But keep fear in check. Ask yourself why Dr. Oz is part of NBC News’ “Coronavirus Crisis Team.” As you encounter information that focuses on worst-case scenarios, seems to exaggerate or downplay unknowns, uses terms like surge, crash, skyrocket, tumble, leaves out conflicting information to create a unipolar stance, is more White House gossip than science, anything that starts with Report: ask yourself if the primary purpose seems to be peddling fear — to sell you a product, to get you to click (you’re the product being sold), to influence your vote (same.) If so, socially isolate yourself from that source.

    And stop reading political journalists to learn about a health issue. I write this from New York, under a declared state of emergency. Yet for all the headlines announcing this new state, one has to dig deep to find the primary motivation for the declaration was simply “a more expedited purchasing and testing protocol.” It’s more about a better bureaucracy now than something with sirens and flashing lights now.

    The numbers will go up until they start going down (it is a virus after all; new cases are declining in China and South Korea) but keep the numbers in perspective. There is nothing investors fear more than uncertainty. Right now, that is all there is and volatility in the markets will continue until uncertainty, and then fear, back off. Lack of testing can artificially hide infected cases but deaths are harder to hide. Before you blame someone or something, figure out how to blame away the virus in China, Italy, Iran, and elsewhere where they don’t have Trump, and do have universal healthcare, sick leave or whatever other partisan talking point is being pushed.Panic is easy, a measured response hard.

    Don’t let fear take from you what the virus is unlikely ever to even threaten.

     

    BONUS!

    Fear as a political tool is common in the modern ear. Never mind fact-checking, the most powerful political ads are built around emotion, with no facts to check. Two of the most well-known are the 1964 “Daisy” TV commercial, which with barely a word said drove voters terrified of nuclear weapons to vote for LBJ over Barry Goldwater.

    In 2008 Hillary Clinton employed a nearly-identical ad against Barack Obama, the famous “3am Phone Call.”


     
     

    Related Articles:




    Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity.

    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedin
  • Recent Comments

    • Rich Bauer said...

      1

      Oh yeah, those damn Democrats using the fear card again. And Trump is the perfect leader in these times of fear. The guy is an absolute Rock of Gibraltar, who has never used the fear card for political gain.

      Peter, get thyself to an informed infirmary stat cause some godawful virus is eating your brain, mate.

      03/14/20 9:10 AM | Comment Link

    • J.L.Seagull said...

      2

      New cases are declining in China and South Korea because of the methods they used. I invite you to look past your armchair media criticism and look at how China actually compares to the US, facts on the ground.

      03/14/20 12:36 PM | Comment Link

    • John Poole said...

      3

      I was close to the AIDS epidemic in the early 80s being part of the musical theatre world as rehearsal pianist and then music director for musicals. The fearful rumor circa ’84 was that gays were purposely infecting the straight community. The gays I knew and worked with would never do such a thing but they also sensed their only hope for a cure was if the disease spread to the larger heterosexual populace. It eventually did but mainly through contaminated needles and poorly administered blood transfusions.

      03/14/20 12:57 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...

      4

      JP,

      Everybody knows HIV was a Russian Operation Infektion plot to rid the world of gay people on orders of RasPutin.

      03/14/20 2:34 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...

      5

      Suggested headline change:“Fear is a terrible way to make decisions”…but it is a distant second to stupidity.

      Trumpie: When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.

      03/14/20 7:18 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...

      6

      There are Knowns and Unknowns…but we all knew

      While the Orange Clown is desperate not to take responsibility for the poor performance in responding to the pandemic, let US all take responsibility for electing morons to positions that can do real damage. “I do not take responsibility” will go down with “Mission Accomplished” as two pivotal moments in America when it learned a hard lesson: Never put your life in the hands of an idiot.

      So now what to do, what to do? Peter is doing his part by writing political satire to keep our minds off the stress of a pandemic. His next article should envision what Trumpie and the Repugnican response would be if Obama was president during a pandemic. Oh wait, Trumpie already has:

      In the summer and fall of 2014, Trump posted close to 100 tweets criticizing and, for lack of a better word, weaponizing, the Obama administration’s response to the Ebola crisis. Trump’s tweets included the observation “I know for sure that our leaders are incompetent.” He called Obama “stupid” and suggested that he “personally embrace all people in the US who contract Ebola!” He also callously tweeted that an American medical worker who had contracted Ebola while abroad shouldn’t be allowed back home, arguing that the person should instead “suffer the consequences!

      There were lots of knowns. We knew Trump. We knew you. Simple folk.These are the common clay of the earth. You know…morons.

      03/15/20 9:23 AM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...

      7

      People are overreacting to the fear there will not be enough ICUs. More than half of the elderly patients needing an ICU are true believers in the Trumpie “Its a Democratic hoax.” So these patients will be willing to defer treatment. Besides, Alex Jobes is selling a toothpaste which kill the virus. Only $50. That’s just a little more than a copayment.

      03/15/20 10:12 AM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...

      8

      CV19 news:

      Taking ibuprofen and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like aspirin can aggravate coronavirus disease. The French Minister of Health Olivier Veran announced this on Twitter.

      Drinking alcohol does not prevent infection. Drinking to the point of passing out will increase social distancing.

      03/15/20 3:41 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...

      9

      Trumpie: Tremendous control.

      Neville Chamberlain: Peace in our time.

      But ended …not so well.

      03/15/20 6:21 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...

      10

      Assume for a sec Trumpie isnt some senile fool, maybe there is some method to his madness in denying the seriousness of the pandemic. We all know Trumpie wanted to trim the federal workforce bigly. Over 30% of the fed workforce is over 55. That age group gets really sick from the virus. The guidance on telework of federal employees is a joke. They cant be that incompetent. So….

      03/15/20 6:45 PM | Comment Link

    • Eric Hodgdon said...

      11

      Statistics and exaggerations aside, I’ve known only two who’ve died of AIDS, and I never worried over it.

      This new thing today, COVID19, while said to be highly contagious, does not appear to be “deadly” at all versus other seasonal things which kill tens of thousands year in year out, not to mention the 30,000+ from vehicles.

      Rational perspective is in order, however, we’re dealing with people in yet another national election year to usher in yet another Generalissimo to “lead” the masses who can’t think very much despite the higher rate of “education” there have.

      Yes, fear remains rampant as most minds are still in the Dark Ages or worse. Bring out the dead was a 102 years ago – that was horrific along with WW2, the many mass killings in Africa of late, the Armenians, Cambodia, … but no, the fear of the many over the few thousand, so far, of COVID19 reinforces the comfort found by those nurturing their adolescent-locked minds.

      03/22/20 11:21 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)