• Wokeness Claims Another Institution; History Fights Back

    December 7, 2021

    Tags: , , , ,
    Posted in: Democracy, Other Ideas, Trump

    When will our intellectual life return to normal, the place Socrates, et al, once left it, where facts come together into conclusions? Today in service to ideologies like CRT a conclusion is established and facts are manipulated or just ignored to support it.

    You can’t argue intellectually against something so profoundly unintellectual but you can still take note of it in hopes someday we will want to untangle ourselves. That’s why we’re visiting today the Tenement Museum on New York’s Lower East Side.

    When I joined the Museum as an educator in early 2016 it was a small, elegant, good place. Inside a restored 19th century tenement apartment house, it told the story of some of the actual all-immigrant families who had lived there, from inside their actual apartments. Of the over 7,000 people who inhabited that building over its lifespan, researchers established who had lived in which rooms, detailed their lives, forensically reconstructed the surroundings, and we shared that with guests. Rule 1 was always “keep it in the room,” focus on specific individuals and how they lived in the room where you were standing. Over the years these included Irish, Jewish, German, and Italian immigrants. There had been no Bangladeshi’s, Spaniards or blacks; their stories lay elsewhere, “outside the room.” It is the same reason there is no monument to those who died on D-Day at Gettysburg. That didn’t happen there. That story is told somewhere else.

    Imagine the power of telling the story of an immigrant family’s struggle between earning a living in the new factories demanding labor in New York, and the pull of maintaining their own religious traditions from their living room where such family arguments took place. Think about explaining sweat shop conditions in a room that was actually such a place. No need to talk about lack of space and privacy, it was literally all around visitors. The Rogarshevsky family walked this hall. The Baldizzi family put their hands on this banister to climb the stairs at the end of a weary day. They came home to this evening light in their parlor. They smelled the rain as visitors did on a March day. You could literally feel history.

    After Trump’s election everything changed. Our mission at the Museum went from telling real stories to “fighting fascism and destroying the patriarchy.” With our focus on immigration, we were given tips on handling what the museum snidely called “red hats,” MAGA-capped Trump supporters, usually parents visiting a hip child in NYC who dragged them in for reeducation. I witnessed an Asian museum educator say out loud without any concern by management “No more Jews, I want to tell my story!” Her parents were university professors from Asia and she was born in a toney NYC suburb, so I’m not quite sure what her story was. Narratives were rewritten, so for example the Irish immigrants went from suffering anti-Catholic discrimination in Protestant New York to being murderers of innocent blacks during the 1863 Draft Riots. Never mind the Irish family spotlighted by the Museum lived there in 1869 with no connection to the Riots.

    The wokeness which drove me to quit is now poised for a new lows in a desperate move to shoehorn a black family into the mix because of course everything has to be about race. The Museum is planning for the first time not only to feature the story of a (black) family who never lived there, the family were not even immigrants, born instead in New Jersey. To accommodate this change, the Museum will do away with its current Irish family tour in lieu of a hybrid to emphasize black suffering and deemphasize the actual life experiences of discrimination imposed on the Irish by “whiter” New Yorkers. They will build a “typical” apartment of the time on the fifth floor for the black family, an ahistorical space they never lived in, an affront to those whose real life stories once did. It would make as much sense to build a space to tell Spiderman’s story.

    The existing Irish tour is particularly important because it supports a classist, not racial, basis for discrimination in America. It forces guests to think through the roots of inequality given that rich white people already established in New York discriminated against poor white people (the Irish first, then the Jews and Italians.) That narrative is problematic in 2021 because it spreads victimhood broadly, and chips away at the BLM meme that race is the cause of everything.

    The story is also problematic in 2021 because it emphasized how the Irish organized themselves politically to fight back and claim a more equal place in society. Many of the Irish had entered the United States before there even was any immigration law, simply walking off ships into the New World. Later, as nascent citizenship laws demanded proof of several years of residence as a condition for regularized status, many Irish could not prove it, the purest form of undocumented as no documentation existed when they went feet dry. The post-Civil War amendments to the Constitution designed to overnight change freed slaves into American citizens with the right to vote also scooped up masses of Irish immigrants. Aided by the sleazy needs of men like Boss Tweed who were willing to trade patronage jobs for votes, the Irish began to prosper.

    If you wanted to ask the question of how the Irish did that, and later the Jews, Germans, Italians, Hispanics, and Chinese, but not blacks, you were once welcome to do so. In better days the museum referred to this as “introducing complexity,” asking questions without clear answers instead of imposing a pre-written doctrine on guests. No more. The Irish are once again not popular among the rich white people running New York, this time in the guise of the Tenement Museum. Their story will exist only as a sidebar to a black experience that never really was. It is a literal rewriting of history. What a shame a place designed to help us remember wants to make us forget.

    Related Articles:

    Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity.

  • Recent Comments

    • Rich Bauer said...


      The Irish have not been popular among Jews, who still have it in them since Ireland declared its neutrality in World War 2. “The enemy of my enemy…” They shunned Jews fleeing Nazi Germany. In 1936, the Department of Justice noted a rise in public protests against admitting Jews: the anti-Semitic policies of the blueshirts, the Irish Christian Front’s warnings of “alien penetration of Irish industries” and the Irish Catholic’s aside in January 1937 that “Hitler has many admirers among Irish Catholics”.

      Maybe you can start a program to tell that story.

      12/7/21 2:26 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      Not forgetting this day that lives in infamy, would be interested in the “Asian educator’s” story. Was it the Japanese rape of China? Would be interested in the different points (read: rewriting of history) of views of “Asians.”

      12/7/21 3:49 PM | Comment Link

    • John Poole said...


      My wife and I still enjoy reminiscing about the Irish Rep’s compelling 2nd production of EMPEROR JONES. Will The Irish Rep do another revival of the play? Eugene O’Neill’s Brutus Jones may be too politically “insensitive”.

      12/8/21 9:49 AM | Comment Link

    • Joe said...


      Clawing your way to the top of the Victim Pyramid (or deciding who your heart should bleed for if you’re a victim groupie) is hard work nowadays. But one easy way to grab more of the limelight is to discredit, disregard or disappear the hardships that other, “lesser” groups of victims actually endure(d.) Of course this sort of “logic” is anything but, though it still does appeal to the large segment of our population that is irrationally emotional.

      My favorite example of how this infighting can and has played out is the ongoing culture war between feminists and transgender advocates over whether or not transgender women should be allowed to participate in women’s sports. Many feminist, female athletes who’ve raised (valid IMO) concerns about biological women becoming second class citizens in their own sports (which in most cases are already considered poor substitutes for their male counterparts) have of course been labeled “transphobic” for (gasp!) simply expressing their views. Why? Because women’s sports and feminism are yesterday’s news, and transgender rights are now the top tier of the VP. Where will this all end? That’s a good question, but as renowned historian Yuval Harari (who teaches at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and has written books recommended by Barack Obama and Bill Gates) said “Never underestimate human stupidity.”

      12/8/21 4:45 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      Given Ireland’s history with Germany, not surprised Germany celebrates St. Patrick’s Day. Am surprised St Patrick’s is widely celebrated in Russia, which has few Irish migrants. Yes, the Russian will find any reason to get bombed, but…

      12/8/21 7:48 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)