• Questions for the January 6 Committee

    January 29, 2022

    Tags: , , , , ,
    Posted in: Democracy


    Important questions about what happened on January 6 are left unanswered if they would disturb the Democratic narrative. These potential game-changers are ignored for the most part, or wish-washed away by claiming they are “conspiracy theories” somehow not worth looking into.

    This is quite funny, given that the Democrat flailing is built entirely around a narrative of conspiracy, i.e., Trump or one his Dementors working in conjunction with someone else in a criminal act. In a divided America, not answering important questions simply gives them more credibility among their believers. It seems better for a Democracy in Danger [(C) WaPo] to get more information out there to put such conspiracy theories to rest by proving them wrong. Why just assign Seth Meyers to mock troublesome ideas when they could be factually disposed of? Whatcha ‘fraid of? Can’t handle the truth, bro?

    So, to the January 6 Committee, please answer the following for us: how many undercover personnel or informants were in the crowd January 6? What part, if any, did they play in planning the entry into the Capitol before or on January 6, or in encouraging the crowd to do so? Did any stray from being accessories after the fact into Agent Provocateurs? As sure as the Warren Commission before them, the people claiming there is no evidence are the same one blocking any investigation which would reveal that evidence.


    The Committee has adopted the stance something caused the crowd to bust into the Capitol. They have not spent much time allowing for anything along the lines of group think on the crowd’s part, like when fans swarm the field and tear down the goalposts. Having eliminated spontaneous causes, the only real cause the Committee is considering is Trump. Trump via preplanning the attack as part of some elaborate coup attempt, Trump via his purposeful incitement of the crowd on hand, or Trump through some third parties, doesn’t matter who, so Roger Stone, Rudy Giuliani, QAnon, a cabal at the Willard Hotel war room, because that’s called a conspiracy. The Committee does not seem to have any Subject B, just Trump.

    So let’s propose a Subject B, in this case, the FBI. It is a simply question from the Committee: Mr. Attorney General, how many undercover people did you have on the ground January 6? How many of them traveled to DC with groups they had previously infiltrated elsewhere? What was their purpose on January 6? What were their rules of engagement? In other words, what were they allowed to say or do? Could they scream “Yeah, let’s go!” and lead people forward? Could they suggest a peaceful group attack Pelosi’s office? Could they give statements to the media misrepresenting the aims and mood of the crowd without revealing their identity? Were any working as “sources” for the media, planting rumors?

    You would think at least the number of officers on the ground would be an easy one, yet when Rep. Thomas Massie asked AG Merrick Garland if any Federal agents or assets entered the Capitol or incited others to riot, Garland refused to answer. Massie played a video of a man January 5 saying “we” have to go into the Capitol, and asked Garland if that man was a Fed. No comment, said Garland.

    The man in the video has been identified as Ray Epps, who is also seen on video organizing the first group to breach the Capitol, and that just one minute after a pipe bomb had been found, as if the acts were themselves a conspiracy. This all appears to have happened even before Trump even finished his “incitement” speech. Epps was also President of Arizona Oath keepers and a former Marine. Epps has refused to answer journalists’ questions about whether or not he is a Federal agent or informant. Epps is still a free man. Why?

    After Garland’s non-answer about undercover operatives failed to satisfy even the squishy MSM, the January 6 Committee decided to issue a tweeted statement claimed they “spoke” to Epps, who by golly said he was not an agent and the matter was dropped as cleanly as the Umbrella Man was in the JFK assassination. The always-helpful NYT said “while it remains unclear why Mr. Epps was encouraging people to go into the building, a person cannot be charged with incitement unless his statements present an imminent threat of unlawful action.” That too is funny, because a week later Oath Keeper Stewart Rhodes, who also did not enter the Capitol, was indicted on the legal pastiche of “seditious conspiracy.” Without double standards there would be no standards at all.


    The Epps case raises two key questions. Since Epps was talking about storming the Capitol the night before, that would seem to be exculpatory evidence that Trump’s speech had little to do with it. The plan was already in motion. And of course if Epps was working in any way with law enforcement, that would suggest it was he who played at least a role in getting the crowd to attack. You can’t just call it paranoia and conspiracy theory to simply ask why after some 700 prosecutions of others involved with January 6, Epps has not been prosecuted. Or why Epps’ photo was at one point included on the FBI Capitol Violence most wanted website and then removed without explanation in July from the website.

    It is as simple as this. Under oath and before the Committee, ask FBI Director Wray, AG Garland, and Ray Epps to answer yes or no: did Ray Epps work for or with the Federal government in any way? Yes or no moves the narrative productively forward and could even add to the credibility of the Committee among skeptics. Why won’t they do this?

    If Epps was working for the Feds on January 6, we already know he was not alone. A Proud Boys member turned by the FBI was texting his handler from the middle of the crowd (the Times also claims the FBI had a second informant in the crowd; other sources suggest a group of protestors wearing blaze orange caps were purposely exempted from prosecution as they were informants of some sort.) The story has not received much play in the MSM, because the informant was adamant the Capitol attack was not planned in advance. In fact, none of the 737 people charged so far with January 6 related crimes claimed the attack was preplanned, that Trump incited them, or anything to suggest anything but that what happened happened because of events on the ground in the crowd. Quite the contrary; several have stood up in court and admitted they felt betrayed by Trump and were deluded by his efforts to portray the election as rigged.

    Undercover officers can legally commit crimes, including perjury. Same for paid sources, informants, and snitches. This practice of authorized criminality is secret, unaccountable, and in conflict with some of the basic premises of democratic policing. It exists independently of whether or not the person of concern can be listed as an unindicted co-conspirator. That is relatively meaningless anyway as the easiest thing is simply to not list the undercover on any charging documents at all.

    There are other simple questions whose answers could send the investigation down complex paths. While the Justice Department has called the inquiry one of the largest in its history, why has no information come to light on the pipe bomber, who planted two unsuccessful bombs and set off an aura of panic? Official Washington is one of the most heavily surveilled spots on earth; why hasn’t the Justice Department allowed for the public release of more than a few minutes of the 14,000 hours of security camera footage? The nearly endless social media video online only shows the riot well in process. The surveillance video would show what happened just before the breach.

    Knowing the FBI had informants in the crowd and among the organizations behind the initial rally, we need to know what did they know and when did they know it, specicially in answer to the quesion of what role if any Trump played in the unfolding events. Why has the report on the cop who gunned down protestor Ashli Babbit not been released? Why and on who’s order did the Capitol Police allow hundreds of people to simply walk into the building on the afternoon of January 6? Over 300 protesters entered the building without resistance from Capitol Police. And who was the man in a bicycle helmet whom video shows initiating the window-smashing that ended in the shooting of Ashli Babbitt and why was he welcomed behind police lines once things got out of hand?


    We would not need to ask all these questions if the FBI and others did not have such a clear and present history of infiltrating protests and provoking violence; here’s a brief history going back to the Vietnam War era. Hand-in-hand is the FBI’s history of “creating” crimes using planted agents. The Terrorism Era was littered with “plots” that once laid bare, were built around an FBI person recruiting fellow “terrorists,” supplying them with money and (fake) weapons, and then busting them for believing him. Read more here and here.

    A more recent example involved a supposed plot, seen by many as a precursor to the January 6 assault, to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. At least 12 FBI confidential informants were involved. However, an investigation also reveals some of those informants, acting under the direction of the FBI, played a far larger role than just snitching. They had a hand in nearly every aspect of the alleged plot, starting with its inception. The extent of their involvement raises questions as to whether there would have even been a conspiracy without them. For all the noise made asking how high the January 6 investigation might eventually go, no one seems to be looking lower, to people who were working that day amongst the protestors just as they had in Michigan.

    This is not say claim Ray Epps is this year’s version of the Grassy Knoll, or that the FBI laid out a full-on Mr. X-style operation to destroy Donald Trump. It is to say the narrative needs to be expanded beyond “Trump did it and democracy is finished” to answer some simple questions. Because if one FBI person assisted, instigated, aided, or abetted in any way what happened on January 6, either by orders or in the heat of the moment, that changes everything. And with the January 6 narrative changed, the election of 2024 changes. It really does matter that the investigation look deeper than Trump as the lone gunman, even if to disprove any Federal involvement.


    Related Articles:

    Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity.

  • Recent Comments

    • John Poole said...


      My guess is the 2024 election will be historically odd due to many contested narratives. Both primaries might be so contentious that numerous splinter parties form beyond the usual one or two.

      01/30/22 10:14 AM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      The important question you haven’t asked: what will convictions matter when this lunatic pardons the criminals?

      But wait, there’s more:

      Trump: If these radical, vicious, racist prosecutors do anything wrong or illegal, I hope we are going to have in this country the biggest protest we have ever had in Washington DC, in New York, in Atlanta and elsewhere because our country and our elections are corrupt,”

      Pardon me?

      01/30/22 10:47 AM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      Cant see the real False Flag for the DT

      While the lunatics who attacked the police were obviously drunk on their own white power, ask the question who was DT really working for in a cunning op to destroy the GOP chances to occupy the White House. He gets the mob wired and then runs home to watch them destroy the reputation of the GOP as the haha law and order party. The FBI is now the enemy of the state, right, PVB?

      DT is solely responsible for the GOP losing the House, the Senate and the White House? The clown still lost even the Electoral College could have overcome his 8 million voter defeat.

      Republicans in states races like Virginia are unfortunately catching onto his insider false flag scheme. They are not buying his latest grift to offer pardons for the rioters, no doubt with a nice political contribution attached. Watch for more Republicans in state races to tell DT they aren’t interested in his drunk dreams. Oh well, eventually dumbass Americans realize they have been fooled by the false flag…after the war is lost.

      01/30/22 4:19 PM | Comment Link

    • John Poole said...


      Bauer- Did you consult with Oliver Stone before suggesting Trump is now waving a black umbrella at the Republican Party for failing him? I’m sticking with the likely reason and purpose to Trump’s behavior, actions, thoughts and utterances are due to a pathological personality and toxic need for retaliation. Sane people are hoping he doesn’t or can’t run for POTUS in 2024 either as a Republican or Independent but sane people are hardly the majority in today’s America.

      01/31/22 1:06 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...



      If the Repugs were smart, they should dump Trump the antiMidas, given his disastrous performance. Independents and educated Republicans are getting tired of this clown. Trump is convicting himself more each day. Repugs in non-redneck states now have a better chance of winning without him.

      Assuming Trump is the Repug candidate in 2024, the Pompous Pig could work a deal with RazPutin to hand over the Moscow Hooker peepee tape for Ukraine concessions. Pompeo could blackmail Trump to make him VP and force him to resign in 2026-27. Just a conspiracy theory…just asking questions. Maybe Joe Rogan could do an episode…

      01/31/22 2:27 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      “And with the January 6 narrative changed, the election of 2024 changes. “

      Yes, imagine if President Harris uses the Trump memo to change the 2024 election:

      Effective immediately, the Secretary of Defense shall seize, collect, retain and analyze all machines, equipment, electronically stored information, and material records required for retention under United States Code Title 42, Sections 1974-1974(e), including but not limited to those identified in footnote 1. The Secretary of Defense has discretion to determine the interdiction of national critical infrastructure supporting federal elections. Designated locations will be identified in the operation order.

      02/1/22 8:18 AM | Comment Link

    • John Poole said...


      Bauer: I think 2024 will be for the Democrats to somehow lose again. As I stated before the election whatever the outcome will most likely be contested and we might be in completely new territory with some regions declaring independence and no longer beholding to any Federal oversight.

      02/1/22 9:23 AM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...



      The gutting of the poor white class will continue unabated. The rich are looting these poor folks until most have no savings or Social Security to even consider retirement. Work till you drop…”Arbeit macht mein frei.”

      God forbid there is a depression this decade. Then this combo will create conditions similar to Nazi Germany where a dictator will rise to save them …from themselves. Fox News loves dictators.

      Heil Herr Hannity!

      02/2/22 1:45 PM | Comment Link

    • John Poole said...


      Bauer- even though I’m typing this from Moscow I dread what my children and grandchildren might have to contend with in their adopted homeland of America. I have to remind myself that times have been horrible for regular folk in America and somehow the poh folk come through because they are usually more resourceful than the corrupt rich. Hunter Biden is super rich but can’t stay off dope and the ladies of the night.

      02/3/22 12:43 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...



      Speaking of Poor Folk, FB Zuckerberg’s stock lost 30 billion bucks today. If you and your fellow Russkie trolls would use FB more instead of bothering PVB on WMW, Zuckerberg would be so grateful.

      02/3/22 10:24 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)