• Trump is Just Not Going to Jail

    May 9, 2022

    Tags: , , , , , ,
    Posted in: Biden, Trump

    If you had “Trump goes to jail” in the office pool, better double-down on “Trump Gets a Minor Civil Fine.”

    The end of any possible criminal prosecution out of New York over Trump’s finances has come as the grand jury seated to find them has sunseted. The possibility of a civil penalty, likely a fine, looks poor but anything is possible. This is all a long way from predictions when these cases were initiated through the Southern District of New York (SDNY) that the walls were supposedly closing in. Dems, dragging all their Biden baggage along, are going to have to beat Trump at the ballot box, assuming anyone can afford the gas to drive out to vote.

    We need not spend too much time on all the failures preceding those of the SDNY, though a list is educational: DNC server, Putin’s agent, all of Russiagate, Mueller Report, Impeachment I, Impeachment II, and Stormy Daniels. The January 6 campaign is floundering. The IRS has had Trump’s taxes in hands for decades without any criminal prosecutions, and the New Jersey Gaming Commission held Trump’s casino financials without incident. It is possible to conclude however much one might hate Trump, he just is not guilty of any crimes.

    Each prosecutorial dream began with the certainty Trump did something wrong, that the evidence was growing, that some stooge would flip (and the mindless Godfather references), followed by… nothing much. The true believers will always believe, but for most Americans the over-stimulus followed by the let down followed by mumblings it all wasn’t fair again have grown tiresome. Yet there are always teachable moments, even in such farce, and the most recent failure in Manhattan to bring down Trump is one of those.

    Like all of the capers, it begins with the premise Trump is sleazy and any success he enjoyed must be due to cheating. In the instant case, the DA claimed The Trump Organization had over-valued some properties to obtain loans from Deutsche Bank, and then under-valued those same properties to pay lower taxes to the city of New York. This is all that’s left in the civil action in New York against Trump. The investigation along these lines has been running since 2019, so far with no actionable results. The most recent legal move was a contempt citation against Trump over not turning over a couple of cell phones, that after Trump already complied with millions of pages of documents and 13 employees of the Trump Organization sent up for interview. The belief seems to be there must be something in there somewhere.

    For anyone who has owned property in New York, either directly like Trump or via the co-op system like millions of middle class New Yorkers, none of this is a headline. It literally happens all the time. For example, Building A sits on land the City has taxed for hundreds of years. The value of that land in that context is hardly in contention. But if someone wanted to use that land as collateral for a loan, they might instead explain how the ground floor of the building is now ready for flush post-Covid clients to return. They might cite a new luxury building across the street, which will raise local real estate prices. They might show how the average tenant stays longer in their building then elsewhere, assuring stability. What something is worth — a building, a Pokeman card, a drink of water in the desert — is very much a negotiation between two sides. This is known as valuation.” There are numerous methods of assessing the value of a property. In New York you have your assessed value, your transitional value (Tax Class 2, 3, and 4 only) and other variables such that there are lawyers who specialize in nothing else.

    Banks, which look to the future to make sure their loan will be profitable, understand well what the DA is trying to avoid, that property valuation is inherently subjective. It is important to note Trump loan seller Deutsche Bank has raised no objections, made no claims of fraud, and has not asked the DA to look into all this. Nope, the Manhattan DA’s office itself scanned the skies over Gotham and decided they saw a crime. Some say it was a political action, because in almost every other value dispute case in New York history the issue was sorted out by negotiation, and at last resort, by a special civil court that does nothing else. No one can say Trump is the only instance where the City has jumped from valuation to a criminal case with a grand jury, but it is damn hard to find another modern example.

    For the New York DA to “win” a political case like this, some written decision by a no-name magistrate judge’s tax court saying Trump should pay some more property tax is far from enough. So, they had to imagine the case as a criminal one, and that’s where everything falls apart (as with obstruction, as with incitement.) Though the law differs with obstruction and incitement to some extent, basically to win these as a criminal cases the DA has to prove criminal intent. So prosecutors would have had to prove not just that Trump inflated the value of his assets, but that he intended to break the law doing so. Even harder is to show the valuation was Trump’s personal decision, near impossible to do with massive, complex corporations where the actual decision maker is traditionally obscured exactly to avoid such liability.

    Prosecutors fell victim to their own prejudices. They had hoped to “flip” Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization’s longtime finance chief by drumming up equally weak criminal tax charges against him. Those charges have to do with Weisselberg accepting car service and apartment payments from Trump and allegedly not declaring them properly as income on his taxes. These cases are again typically settled with a fine (though Weisselberg maintains innocence) not jail. The infamous Al Capone tax case is infamous because it was so unique. Weisselberg, with his years of financial experience, has a pretty good idea he is not going to jail and thus has little incentive to rat out Trump if indeed he had anything to rat about.

    That pretty much left prosecutors with Michael Cohen, the guy who pleaded guilty to nine criminal offenses, including lying to Congress, tax fraud, and campaign finance violations. Cohen would have faced questions of personal bias, given his own multiple lawsuits against Trump. He would have faced questions about whether he received a benefit from prosecutors, early release from prison, for cooperating. If a liar like Cohen is your only witness on Trump’s intent, you really have no witnesses.

    There are still 19 cases pending against Trump, including a number of civil suits. Maybe one of them will land a blow. But none have the potential to be the knock-out punch Dems thought was an easy route to winning 2024.

    Related Articles:

    Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved. The views expressed here are solely those of the author(s) in their private capacity.

  • Recent Comments

    • John Poole said...


      I guess we can now say the same for Hunter or Joe Biden. Once you accept that the “rich” (and politically powerful) are indeed different then one can accept that the law does not apply to everyone equally. Still, it is a very useful motto to claim that no one is above the law. It works well so far to tamp down any envious outrage of the proles.

      05/9/22 4:25 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      Tell US again why the Dems would want Trump not to be the face of the Repugs. The Repug hierarchy wished he went to jail long ago.

      05/10/22 7:39 AM | Comment Link

    • John Poole said...


      Bauer- you may be in a very small minority wanting Trump to pay for his sins in this realm. As far as his continuing usefulness to the Republican Party that- in my opinion- depends upon his choice of a running partner if he runs for POTUS in 2024. Both Pence and Pompeo may challenge him if not picked for VP. Who would run against Trump in 2024? Joe Biden? Hillary? Kamala? (if Biden steps aside) Buttigieg? or somebody currently not on the political radar? It might be a beloved actor or celebrity with no political baggage who could run as an Independent and steal the POTUS crown in 2024.

      05/10/22 3:13 PM | Comment Link

    • John Poole said...


      Bauer: PVB needs some advocates and a signed petition to Musk for his Twitter account to be restored. I’m not sure why someone needs a twitter account but he shouldn’t be denied if that is what he wants. He has earned the right to tweet. Me? I’m a woodpecker thumping away on a rotten tree trunk with nobody listening. It’s not the worst fate one can be dealt by the gods.

      05/10/22 3:17 PM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...



      Tweet is sweet for a place to meet for Birds of a feather who flock together.

      05/11/22 5:42 AM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      Oh wait, I get it. Peter is implying Trump is not only going to jail, but that worse things are going to happen to him. He is going to be poor too.

      05/12/22 11:21 AM | Comment Link

    • Rich Bauer said...


      Trump: Obama was not born in the US.

      Trump: I won the 2020 election.

      Trump: I never made false statements to the IRS, the New York State tax authorities, my banks, my wife, my mistresses. I am the best truth-teller there ever was.

      05/13/22 1:21 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

    Mail (will not be published) (required)